[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171007064238.odg7ju6pvqudzf6p@latitude>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:42:38 +0200
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, broonie@...nel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org, bp@...e.de,
poeschel@...onage.de, treding@...dia.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, andreas.noever@...il.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
jkosina@...e.cz, sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il, joe@...ches.com,
davem@...emloft.net, james.hogan@...tec.com,
michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kheitke@...ience.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 2/7] slimbus: Add messaging APIs to slimbus framework
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:51:31PM +0200, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
> From: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
>
> Slimbus devices use value-element, and information elements to
> control device parameters (e.g. value element is used to represent
> gain for codec, information element is used to represent interrupt
> status for codec when codec interrupt fires).
> Messaging APIs are used to set/get these value and information
> elements. Slimbus specification uses 8-bit "transaction IDs" for
> messages where a read-value is anticipated. Framework uses a table
> of pointers to store those TIDs and responds back to the caller in
> O(1).
> Caller can opt to do synchronous, or asynchronous reads/writes. For
> asynchronous operations, the callback will be called from atomic
> context.
> TX and RX circular rings are used to allow queuing of multiple
> transfers per controller. Controller can choose size of these rings
> based of controller HW implementation. The buffers are coerently
s/based of/based on/
s/coerently/coherently/
> mapped so that controller can utilize DMA operations for the
> transactions without remapping every transaction buffer.
> Statically allocated rings help to improve performance by avoiding
> overhead of dynamically allocating transactions on need basis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> ---
[...]
> +static u16 slim_slicecodefromsize(u16 req)
> +{
> + static const u8 codetosize[8] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16};
> +
> + if (req >= ARRAY_SIZE(codetosize))
> + return 0;
> + else
> + return codetosize[req];
> +}
> +
> +static u16 slim_slicesize(int code)
> +{
> + static const u8 sizetocode[16] = {
> + 0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7
> + };
> +
> + clamp(code, 1, (int)ARRAY_SIZE(sizetocode));
> + return sizetocode[code - 1];
> +}
> +
> +int slim_xfer_msg(struct slim_controller *ctrl,
> + struct slim_device *sbdev, struct slim_val_inf *msg,
> + u8 mc)
> +{
> + DEFINE_SLIM_LDEST_TXN(txn_stack, mc, 6, sbdev->laddr, msg);
> + struct slim_msg_txn *txn = &txn_stack;
> + int ret;
> + u16 sl, cur;
> +
> + ret = slim_val_inf_sanity(ctrl, msg, mc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + sl = slim_slicesize(msg->num_bytes);
> +
> + dev_dbg(&ctrl->dev, "SB xfer msg:os:%x, len:%d, MC:%x, sl:%x\n",
> + msg->start_offset, msg->num_bytes, mc, sl);
> +
> + cur = slim_slicecodefromsize(sl);
> + txn->ec = ((sl | (1 << 3)) | ((msg->start_offset & 0xFFF) << 4));
Shouldn't this be (cur | (1 << 3)?
(Also, what does cur mean? Cursor? Current?)
> +
> + switch (mc) {
> + case SLIM_MSG_MC_REQUEST_CHANGE_VALUE:
> + case SLIM_MSG_MC_CHANGE_VALUE:
> + case SLIM_MSG_MC_REQUEST_CLEAR_INFORMATION:
> + case SLIM_MSG_MC_CLEAR_INFORMATION:
> + txn->rl += msg->num_bytes;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (slim_tid_txn(txn->mt, txn->mc))
> + txn->rl++;
> +
> + return slim_processtxn(ctrl, txn);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(slim_xfer_msg);
[...]
> +/*
> + * slim_request_val_element: change and request a given value element
> + * @sb: client handle requesting elemental message reads, writes.
> + * @msg: Input structure for start-offset, number of bytes to write.
> + * context: can sleep
> + * Returns:
> + * -EINVAL: Invalid parameters
> + * -ETIMEDOUT: If transmission of this message timed out (e.g. due to bus lines
> + * not being clocked or driven by controller)
> + * -ENOTCONN: If the transmitted message was not ACKed by destination device.
Does rbuf contain the old value after this function finishes?
> + */
> +int slim_request_change_val_element(struct slim_device *sb,
> + struct slim_val_inf *msg)
> +{
> + struct slim_controller *ctrl = sb->ctrl;
> +
> + if (!ctrl)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return slim_xfer_msg(ctrl, sb, msg, SLIM_MSG_MC_REQUEST_CHANGE_VALUE);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(slim_request_change_val_element);
[...]
> +/**
> + * struct slim_pending: context of pending transfers
> + * @cb: callback for this transfer
> + * @ctx: contex for the callback function
s/contex/context/
> + * @need_tid: True if this transfer need Transaction ID
> + */
> +struct slim_pending {
> + void (*cb)(void *ctx, int err);
> + void *ctx;
> + bool need_tid;
> +};
Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists