Date:   Sat, 7 Oct 2017 11:56:15 -0500
From:   Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/50] 4.4.91-stable review


> On Oct 6, 2017, at 3:52 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.91 release.
> There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun Oct  8 08:36:32 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.91-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> -------------

From Linaro’s validation farm we have the following test results. TI's 32 bit arm board the X15 is a new addition.  More of LTP is being run. There is triage to do and you’ll notice that I’m differentiating between ‘known failures’ and ‘failures’ in the data below. The later obviously will get looked at so we can graduate failures to known failures/fixes and improve finding regressions. (Anyone want to help?) In summary I wouldn’t hold up 4.4.91 based on the failures below, but likewise we shouldn’t get these sit. Given it’s a Sat, the Mrs has plans, I’ve no time to dig until later.

kernel: 4.4.91-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y
git commit: 033261bc663341dfd35771aac2eca2614d6921ea
git describe: v4.4.90-51-g033261bc6633
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.90-51-g033261bc6633


No regressions (compared to build v4.4.90)

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-------------------------------------

juno-r2 - arm64 
* boot - 1 pass
* kselftest - 32 pass - 1 skip - 21 known failures
* libhugetlbfs - 90 pass - 1 skip
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-commands-tests - 25 pass - 13 skip - 6 fail
* ltp-containers-tests - 27 pass - 36 skip - 18 fail
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-filecaps-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-fs-tests - 59 pass - 3 fail
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - 19 pass
* ltp-fsx-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - 22 pass
* ltp-io-tests - 3 pass
* ltp-ipc-tests - 9 pass
* ltp-math-tests - 11 pass
* ltp-nptl-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-pty-tests - 4 pass
* ltp-sched-tests - 13 pass
* ltp-securebits-tests - 4 pass
* ltp-timers-tests - 13 pass

x15 - arm 
* boot - 1 pass
* kselftest - 31 pass - 1 skip - 21 fail
* ltp-syscalls-tests - 1018 pass - 80 skip - 2 fail

dell-poweredge-r200 - x86_64 
* boot - 1 pass
* kselftest - 44 pass - 24 known failures 
* libhugetlbfs - 76 pass - 1 skip
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-commands-tests - 23 pass - 13 skip - 8 fail
* ltp-containers-tests - 63 pass - 18 fail
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-fs-tests - 59 pass - 3 fail
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - 19 pass
* ltp-fsx-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - 22 tests
* ltp-io-tests - 3 pass
* ltp-ipc-tests - 9 pass
* ltp-math-tests - 11 pass
* ltp-nptl-tests - 2 pass
* ltp-pty-tests - 4 pass
* ltp-securebits-tests - 4 pass
* ltp-syscalls-tests - 941 pass - 175 skip - 11 known failures
* ltp-timers-tests - 13 pass

Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports

Powered by blists - more mailing lists