linux-kernel - Re: Building older mips kernels with different versions of binutils; possible patch for 3.2 and 3.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d7d60beb-4875-7cbf-0fd6-26317b97115d@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:49:18 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Building older mips kernels with different versions of binutils;
 possible patch for 3.2 and 3.4

On 10/08/2017 11:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-05-15 at 19:56 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> [...]
>> For 3.4 and 3.2 kernels to build with binutils v2.24, it would be necessary to
>> apply patch c02263063362 ("MIPS: Refactor 'clear_page' and 'copy_page' functions").
>> It applies cleanly to 3.4, but has a Makefile conflict in 3.2. It might
>> make sense to apply this patch to both releases. Would this be possible ?
>> This way, we would have at least one toolchain which can build all 3.2+ kernels.
> 
> I'm finally queueing this up for 3.2.
> 
> Ben.
> 

mipsel images in 3.2.y-queue are now crashing for me. Should I have a look ?

Guenter