[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <759cf76b536ee72c899869dd04caf71f2e7eee06.1507495616.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 13:47:51 -0700
From: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
To: dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org, qipeng.zha@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
sathyaosid@...il.com,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kupuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Use spin_lock to protect GCR updates
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Currently, update_no_reboot_bit() function implemented in this driver
uses mutex_lock() to protect its register updates. But this function is
called with in atomic context in iTCO_wdt_start() and iTCO_wdt_stop()
functions in iTCO_wdt.c driver, which in turn causes "sleeping into
atomic context" issue. This patch fixes this issue by replacing the
mutex_lock() with spin_lock() to protect the GCR read/write/update APIs.
Fixes: 9d855d4 ("platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Fix iTCO_wdt GCS memory mapping failure")
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kupuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
index bb792a5..af88221 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h>
@@ -131,6 +132,7 @@ static struct intel_pmc_ipc_dev {
/* gcr */
void __iomem *gcr_mem_base;
bool has_gcr_regs;
+ spinlock_t gcr_lock;
/* punit */
struct platform_device *punit_dev;
@@ -225,17 +227,17 @@ int intel_pmc_gcr_read(u32 offset, u32 *data)
{
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&ipclock);
+ spin_lock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
ret = is_gcr_valid(offset);
if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
+ spin_unlock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
return ret;
}
*data = readl(ipcdev.gcr_mem_base + offset);
- mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
+ spin_unlock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -255,17 +257,17 @@ int intel_pmc_gcr_write(u32 offset, u32 data)
{
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&ipclock);
+ spin_lock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
ret = is_gcr_valid(offset);
if (ret < 0) {
- mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
+ spin_unlock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
return ret;
}
writel(data, ipcdev.gcr_mem_base + offset);
- mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
+ spin_unlock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -287,7 +289,7 @@ int intel_pmc_gcr_update(u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
u32 new_val;
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&ipclock);
+ spin_lock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
ret = is_gcr_valid(offset);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -309,7 +311,7 @@ int intel_pmc_gcr_update(u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 val)
}
gcr_ipc_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
+ spin_unlock(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_pmc_gcr_update);
@@ -487,6 +489,8 @@ static int ipc_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
ipcdev.dev = &pci_dev_get(pdev)->dev;
ipcdev.irq_mode = IPC_TRIGGER_MODE_IRQ;
+ spin_lock_init(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
+
ret = pci_enable_device(pdev);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -924,6 +928,8 @@ static int ipc_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ipcdev.irq_mode = IPC_TRIGGER_MODE_IRQ;
init_completion(&ipcdev.cmd_complete);
+ spin_lock_init(&ipcdev.gcr_lock);
+
ipcdev.irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (ipcdev.irq < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get irq\n");
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists