[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87376uezjs.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 11:53:11 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] mtd: sharpslpart partition parser
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Robert,
>> Wait a bit before applying. I think patches 6 to 9 have a dependency on
>> patch 1 (it's not a build dependency, but NAND partitioning might be
>> wrong if you apply them), so we need to sync. What release is
>> pxa/for-next targeting? If it's 4.15 I can apply patch 1 just after
>> 4.14-rc1 is out and provide an immutable branch for you to pull in
>> pxa/for-next.
>
> Hi Boris,
>
> It's targeting 4.15 right now. And we can do as you like, either an immutable
> branch, or I wait to include these patches into my pxa/for-next until you give
> me your go, it's as you like.
Hi Boris,
So what's the status about the sync, should I pick the patches, and have the
others make it to your for-next branch ?
Cheers.
--
Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists