[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507472516.16112.328.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 17:21:56 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lib: Adjustments for 11 function implementations
On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 10:42 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Please stop sending this crap. It's a move from one preference to
> another slightly different one. You are free to apply your preference
> if you do a major overhaul of some code (subject to maintainer
> approval),
> but without that they simply are churn.
>
> NAK for both patches.
While patch 1 might have some sense, second one is matter of taste which
is dependent to maintainer/trends/weather on Mars.
So, +1 to Christoph's opinion.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists