linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] staging: ion: create one device entry per heap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171009220858.zwbguqkamzmswqcq@sirena.co.uk>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 23:08:58 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>,
        driverdevel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] staging: ion: create one device entry per heap

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 02:25:47PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:

> Anyway, to move this forward I think we need to see a proof of concept
> of using selinux to protect access to specific heaps.

Aren't Unix permissions enough with separate files or am I
misunderstanding what you're looking to see a proof of concept for?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)