[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47d29965-667d-fe41-1121-bb1e573e8bfe@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 01:17:44 +0300
From: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] media: venus: venc: fix bytesused v4l2_plane field
Hans,
On 9.10.2017 15:31, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 09/10/17 14:24, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> This fixes wrongly filled bytesused field of v4l2_plane structure
>> by include data_offset in the plane, Also fill data_offset and
>> bytesused for capture type of buffers only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c | 9 +++++----
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c
>> index 6f123a387cf9..9445ad492966 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c
>> @@ -963,15 +963,16 @@ static void venc_buf_done(struct venus_inst *inst, unsigned int buf_type,
>> if (!vbuf)
>> return;
>>
>> - vb = &vbuf->vb2_buf;
>> - vb->planes[0].bytesused = bytesused;
>> - vb->planes[0].data_offset = data_offset;
>> -
>> vbuf->flags = flags;
>>
>> if (type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE) {
>> + vb = &vbuf->vb2_buf;
>> + vb2_set_plane_payload(vb, 0, bytesused + data_offset);
>> + vb->planes[0].data_offset = data_offset;
>> vb->timestamp = timestamp_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
>> vbuf->sequence = inst->sequence_cap++;
>> +
>> + WARN_ON(vb2_get_plane_payload(vb, 0) > vb2_plane_size(vb, 0));
>
> It's good to have this, but this really should never happen. Because if it is,
> then you'll have a memory overwrite. I hope the DMA engine will prevent this? >
> Just wondering how this works.
>
> The patch looks good otherwise, but that WARN_ON is a bit scary.
Infact it is not so scary as it looks like, the IOMMU will catch this
and generate a fault. So most probably we will never come to the WARN,
thus the warning is pointless so will delete it.
regards,
Stan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists