linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] detect identical chip data arrays

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710091038340.3252@hadrien>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
        Liam Breck <liam@...workimprov.net>,
        Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] detect identical chip data arrays



On Mon, 9 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:

> 2017-10-09 5:44 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 09:18:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> > Rename battery.cocci as check_bq27xxx_data.cocci and adjust the warning
> >> > messages to indicate that some structures are the same, in response to
> >> > feedback from Liam Breck.
> >> >
> >> > Although check_bq27xxx_data.cocci says is requires Coccinelle 1.0.7, which
> >> > is not yet released, it actually works with the version currently available
> >> > on Github, eg from Coccinelle commit 3ba77b3a0f91.
> >>
> >> I think the rename makes sense, but I would expect the move to
> >> happen in one go with "git send-email -M", so that it detects the
> >> rename.
> >
> > I'm not actually sure what is the status of the previous version.
> > Masahiro said applied, but I downloaded his tree and it was not there.  So
> > I thought this way would be easier.
>
> My tree is here:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git
>
> I had applied your patch a few days before.

OK, I got that tree, but it seemed to go only up to October 1.  But maybe
I did not pick the right branch.

>
>
> BTW, how should I handle this series?
>
> 1/2 is reverting it.
>
> So, I can drop the previous one entirely,
> then pick up 2/2 only.
>
> Is this a good thing to do?

That would be perfectly fine with me.  You can drop 1/2 already.  For 2/2,
it would be nice to have an Ack from Liam first.

thanks,
julia

> --
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>