| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1507543672-25821-11-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:07:42 +0200
From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
jack@...e.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, hpa@...or.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/20] mm: Introduce __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable
The speculative page fault handler which is run without holding the
mmap_sem is calling lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() but the vm_flags
is not guaranteed to remain constant.
Introducing __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() which has the vma flags
value parameter instead of the vma pointer.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 11 +++++++++--
mm/memory.c | 8 ++++----
mm/swap.c | 12 ++++++------
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index cd2f66fdfc2d..a50d64f06bcf 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -324,8 +324,15 @@ extern void swap_setup(void);
extern void add_page_to_unevictable_list(struct page *page);
-extern void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
- struct vm_area_struct *vma);
+extern void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
+ unsigned long vma_flags);
+
+static inline void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ return __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma->vm_flags);
+}
+
/* linux/mm/vmscan.c */
extern unsigned long zone_reclaimable_pages(struct zone *zone);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 49b1dc9a2ed6..687d4395111f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2552,7 +2552,7 @@ static int wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
ptep_clear_flush_notify(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pte);
page_add_new_anon_rmap(new_page, vma, vmf->address, false);
mem_cgroup_commit_charge(new_page, memcg, false, false);
- lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vma);
+ __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(new_page, vmf->vma_flags);
/*
* We call the notify macro here because, when using secondary
* mmu page tables (such as kvm shadow page tables), we want the
@@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (unlikely(page != swapcache && swapcache)) {
page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
- lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+ __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
} else {
do_page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, exclusive);
mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, true, false);
@@ -3215,7 +3215,7 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
- lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+ __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
setpte:
set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, vmf->address, vmf->pte, entry);
@@ -3467,7 +3467,7 @@ int alloc_set_pte(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, vmf->address, false);
mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, false);
- lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+ __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vmf->vma_flags);
} else {
inc_mm_counter_fast(vma->vm_mm, mm_counter_file(page));
page_add_file_rmap(page, false);
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index a77d68f2c1b6..30e1b038f9b0 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -470,21 +470,21 @@ void add_page_to_unevictable_list(struct page *page)
}
/**
- * lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable
- * @page: the page to be added to LRU
- * @vma: vma in which page is mapped for determining reclaimability
+ * __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable
+ * @page: the page to be added to LRU
+ * @vma_flags: vma in which page is mapped for determining reclaimability
*
* Place @page on the active or unevictable LRU list, depending on its
* evictability. Note that if the page is not evictable, it goes
* directly back onto it's zone's unevictable list, it does NOT use a
* per cpu pagevec.
*/
-void lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
- struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+void __lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(struct page *page,
+ unsigned long vma_flags)
{
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page);
- if (likely((vma->vm_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) {
+ if (likely((vma_flags & (VM_LOCKED | VM_SPECIAL)) != VM_LOCKED)) {
SetPageActive(page);
lru_cache_add(page);
return;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists