lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQEUnLu8mc7o80DYfPrQgV4xW+7ehqRd1MJh=NsOTBDaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:02:55 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] net/mlx4: replace <linux/radix-tree.h> with <linux/radix-tree-root.h>

2017-10-09 2:32 GMT+09:00 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 02:29 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> The idea is simple; include necessary headers explicitly.
>
> Try that for kernel.h
>
> There's a reason aggregation of #includes is useful.
>

BTW, talking about <linux/kernel.h>, it is too much aggregation, isn't it?

It exceed 850 lines, and contains lots of unrelated stuff in one header.
Perhaps, it could be a good time to think about splitting?

For example, I see many trace_... things in it.

I wonder if linux/kernel.h is a good home for them, or a separate file.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ