[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1507518307-4823-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@163.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 11:05:07 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
To: dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/cachefiles: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in cachefiles_printk_object
The kernel may sleep under a write spinlock, and the function call path is:
cachefiles_mark_object_active (acquire the spinlock)
cachefiles_printk_object
kmalloc(GFP_NOIO) --> may sleep
To fix it, GFP_NOIO is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC.
This bug is found by my static analysis tool and my code review.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@....com>
---
fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
index 3978b32..39e1504 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static noinline void cachefiles_printk_object(struct cachefiles_object *object,
{
u8 *keybuf;
- keybuf = kmalloc(CACHEFILES_KEYBUF_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
+ keybuf = kmalloc(CACHEFILES_KEYBUF_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (object)
__cachefiles_printk_object(object, "", keybuf);
if (xobject)
--
1.7.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists