[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1507553064.360455512@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 13:44:24 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 094/192] rtc: rtc-nuc900: fix loop timeout test
3.16.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit d0a67c372df410b579197ea818596001fe20070d upstream.
We should change this post-op to a pre-op because we want the loop to
exit with "timeout" set to zero.
Fixes: 0a89b55364e0 ("nuc900/rtc: change the waiting for device ready implement")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-nuc900.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-nuc900.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-nuc900.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int *check_rtc_access_enable(stru
__raw_writel(AERPOWERON, nuc900_rtc->rtc_reg + REG_RTC_AER);
while (!(__raw_readl(nuc900_rtc->rtc_reg + REG_RTC_AER) & AERRWENB)
- && timeout--)
+ && --timeout)
mdelay(1);
if (!timeout)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists