[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1723232.PDSGHSTtIa@diego>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:52:06 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mchehab@...nel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com, hans.verkuil@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] rockchip/rga: v4l2 m2m support
Hi Hans,
Am Montag, 9. Oktober 2017, 14:48:13 CEST schrieb Hans Verkuil:
> On 09/10/17 11:04, Jacob Chen wrote:
> > Rockchip RGA is a separate 2D raster graphic acceleration unit. It
> > accelerates 2D graphics operations, such as point/line drawing, image
> > scaling, rotation, BitBLT, alpha blending and image blur/sharpness
> >
> > The driver supports various operations from the rendering pipeline.
> >
> > - copy
> > - fast solid color fill
> > - rotation
> > - flip
> > - alpha blending
> >
> > The code in rga-hw.c is used to configure regs according to operations
> > The code in rga-buf.c is used to create private mmu table for RGA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>
>
> I ran checkpatch --strict on this patch and I found a few small issues:
>
> WARNING: Avoid crashing the kernel - try using WARN_ON & recovery code
> rather than BUG() or BUG_ON() #1222: FILE:
> drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga.c:89:
> + BUG_ON(!ctx);
>
> WARNING: Avoid crashing the kernel - try using WARN_ON & recovery code
> rather than BUG() or BUG_ON() #1229: FILE:
> drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga.c:96:
> + BUG_ON(!src);
>
> WARNING: Avoid crashing the kernel - try using WARN_ON & recovery code
> rather than BUG() or BUG_ON() #1230: FILE:
> drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga.c:97:
> + BUG_ON(!dst);
>
> I think you can use WARN_ON here and just return.
>
> CHECK: struct mutex definition without comment
> #2235: FILE: drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga.h:84:
> + struct mutex mutex;
>
> CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment
> #2236: FILE: drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rga/rga.h:85:
> + spinlock_t ctrl_lock;
>
> These two fields need a comment describing what the locks protect.
>
> Also move patch 4/4 to the beginning of the patch series. The bindings
> patch should come before the driver.
>
> If I have a v12 with these issues fixed and a MAINTAINERS patch, then
> I'll take it on Friday.
>
> Do you want me to take the dts patches or will they go through another tree?
I'd prefer for me to pick up the dts patches ("ARM: dts" and "arm64: dts:"),
as otherwise we always get conflicts and confusion :-)
I'm monitoring this series, so after you pick the binding + driver, I can
just pick the other two.
Thanks
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists