linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 10/74] md: don't use flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1507552234.966532381@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 09 Oct 2017 13:30:34 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Shaohua Li" <shli@...com>,
        "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.com>,
        "Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 10/74] md: don't use flush_signals in userspace processes

3.2.94-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>

commit f9c79bc05a2a91f4fba8bfd653579e066714b1ec upstream.

The function flush_signals clears all pending signals for the process. It
may be used by kernel threads when we need to prepare a kernel thread for
responding to signals. However using this function for an userspaces
processes is incorrect - clearing signals without the program expecting it
can cause misbehavior.

The raid1 and raid5 code uses flush_signals in its request routine because
it wants to prepare for an interruptible wait. This patch drops
flush_signals and uses sigprocmask instead to block all signals (including
SIGKILL) around the schedule() call. The signals are not lost, but the
schedule() call won't respond to them.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Acked-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
@@ -875,13 +875,16 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *m
 		 */
 		DEFINE_WAIT(w);
 		for (;;) {
-			flush_signals(current);
+			sigset_t full, old;
 			prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_barrier,
 					&w, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 			if (bio->bi_sector + bio->bi_size/512 <= mddev->suspend_lo ||
 			    bio->bi_sector >= mddev->suspend_hi)
 				break;
+			sigfillset(&full);
+			sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &full, &old);
 			schedule();
+			sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &old, NULL);
 		}
 		finish_wait(&conf->wait_barrier, &w);
 	}
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3823,12 +3823,16 @@ static void make_request(struct mddev *m
 				 * userspace, we want an interruptible
 				 * wait.
 				 */
-				flush_signals(current);
 				prepare_to_wait(&conf->wait_for_overlap,
 						&w, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 				if (logical_sector >= mddev->suspend_lo &&
-				    logical_sector < mddev->suspend_hi)
+				    logical_sector < mddev->suspend_hi) {
+					sigset_t full, old;
+					sigfillset(&full);
+					sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &full, &old);
 					schedule();
+					sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &old, NULL);
+				}
 				goto retry;
 			}