[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171009124526.25178d97@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:45:26 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -tip 0/5] kprobes: Abolish jprobe APIs
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 10:55:00 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> So the text first starts talking about 'hooks' then uses the 'callback'
> terminology in the rest of th document. Could we please change it all to
> 'callback'?
>
> [ This is a pet peeve of mine as 'hook' gives me the cringe! ;-) ]
>
Will do.
Thanks for the feedback.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists