linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] mmc: mediatek: add pad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:57:26 +0100
From:   Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
To:     Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yong mao <yong.mao@...iatek.com>,
        Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/12] mmc: mediatek: add pad_tune0 support

Hi,

On 10/10/17 10:30, Chaotian Jing wrote:
> from mt2701, the register of PAD_TUNE has been phased out,
> while there is a new register of PAD_TUNE0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> index ab2fbbb..0dc45b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
>   #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT   0xb0
>   #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT1  0xb4
>   #define MSDC_PAD_TUNE    0xec
> +#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE0   0xf0
>   #define PAD_DS_TUNE      0x188
>   #define PAD_CMD_TUNE     0x18c
>   #define EMMC50_CFG0      0x208
> @@ -301,6 +302,7 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
>   struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
>   	u8 clk_div_bits;
>   	bool hs400_tune; /* only used for MT8173 */
> +	bool pad_tune0;

You only use this to decide whether to use MDSC_PAD_TUNE or 
MSDC_PAD_TUNE0 as tune regs.

Couldn't this field directly be a 'u32' that is either MDSC_PAD_TUNE or 
MDSC_PAD_TUNE0 rather than a bool?

>   };
>   
>   struct msdc_tune_para {
> @@ -362,21 +364,25 @@ struct msdc_host {
>   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8135_compat = {
>   	.clk_div_bits = 8,
>   	.hs400_tune = false,
> +	.pad_tune0 = false,

and here we could have (field could be renamed accordingly of course):

	.pad_tune0 = MDSC_PAD_TUNE,

>   };
>   
>   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
>   	.clk_div_bits = 8,
>   	.hs400_tune = true,
> +	.pad_tune0 = false,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
>   	.clk_div_bits = 12,
>   	.hs400_tune = false,
> +	.pad_tune0 = true,

here:
	.pad_tune0 = MDSC_PAD_TUNE0,

>   };
>   
>   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
>   	.clk_div_bits = 12,
>   	.hs400_tune = false,
> +	.pad_tune0 = true,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
> @@ -581,6 +587,10 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
>   	u32 flags;
>   	u32 div;
>   	u32 sclk;
> +	u32 tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE;
> +
> +	if (host->dev_comp->pad_tune0)
> +		tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0;

And this would not be needed here nor in the other functions, it could 
just be replaced by host->dev_comp->pad_tune0.

Thanks,

-- 
Julien Thierry