[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:01:16 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtlwifi: mark expected switch fall-through in
rtl_make_smps_action
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c
index b88b0e8..cc38907 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtlwifi/base.c
@@ -2334,9 +2334,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *rtl_make_smps_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
case IEEE80211_SMPS_AUTOMATIC:/* 0 */
case IEEE80211_SMPS_NUM_MODES:/* 4 */
WARN_ON(1);
- /* Here will get a 'MISSING_BREAK' in Coverity Test, just ignore it.
- * According to Kernel Code, here is right.
- */
+ /* fall through */
case IEEE80211_SMPS_OFF:/* 1 */ /*MIMO_PS_NOLIMIT*/
action_frame->u.action.u.ht_smps.smps_control =
WLAN_HT_SMPS_CONTROL_DISABLED;/* 0 */
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists