linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 15/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment descriptor base address and limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1507751821.17492.28.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:57:01 -0700
From:   Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Chen Yucong <slaoub@...il.com>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 15/29] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get
 segment descriptor base address and limit

On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 17:15 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 08:54:18PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > 
> > With segmentation, the base address of the segment is needed to compute a
> > linear address. This base address is obtained from the applicable segment
> > descriptor. Such segment descriptor is referenced from a segment selector.
> ...
> 
> > 
> > +unsigned long insn_get_seg_base(struct pt_regs *regs, int seg_reg_idx)
> > +{
> > +	struct desc_struct *desc;
> > +	short sel;
> > +
> > +	sel = get_segment_selector(regs, seg_reg_idx);
> > +	if (sel < 0)
> > +		return -1L;
> > +
> > +	if (v8086_mode(regs))
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Base is simply the segment selector shifted 4
> > +		 * positions to the right.
> > +		 */
> > +		return (unsigned long)(sel << 4);
> > +
> > +	if (user_64bit_mode(regs)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Only FS or GS will have a base address, the rest of
> > +		 * the segments' bases are forced to 0.
> > +		 */
> > +		unsigned long base;
> > +
> > +		if (seg_reg_idx == INAT_SEG_REG_FS)
> > +			rdmsrl(MSR_FS_BASE, base);
> > +		else if (seg_reg_idx == INAT_SEG_REG_GS)
> > +			/*
> > +			 * swapgs was called at the kernel entry point.
> > Thus,
> > +			 * MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE will have the user-space GS
> > base.
> > +			 */
> > +			rdmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, base);
> > +		else if (seg_reg_idx != INAT_SEG_REG_IGNORE)
> > +			/* We should ignore the rest of segment registers.
> > */
> > +			base = -1L;
> When is that case ever possible in long mode? You either have GS/FS
> bases or 0. What's the meaning of -1L in that case?

This is meant to be an error case. In long mode, only INAT_SEG_REG_IGNORE/FS/GS
are valid. All other indices are invalid.

Perhaps we could return -EINVAL instead?

> Otherwise just minor things:
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> index 7ba5379a2923..e7e82b343bd0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
> @@ -515,13 +515,13 @@ static struct desc_struct *get_desc(unsigned short sel)
>   *
>   * Obtain the base address of the segment as indicated by the segment
> descriptor
>   * pointed by the segment selector. The segment selector is obtained from the
> - * input segment register index seg_reg_idx.
> + * input segment register index @seg_reg_idx.
>   *
>   * Returns:
>   *
>   * In protected mode, base address of the segment. Zero in long mode,
>   * except when FS or GS are used. In virtual-8086 mode, the segment
> - * selector shifted 4 positions to the right.
> + * selector shifted 4 bits to the right.
>   *
>   * -1L in case of error.
>   */
> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ unsigned long insn_get_seg_base(struct pt_regs *regs, int
> seg_reg_idx)
>  	if (v8086_mode(regs))
>  		/*
>  		 * Base is simply the segment selector shifted 4
> -		 * positions to the right.
> +		 * bits to the right.
>  		 */
>  		return (unsigned long)(sel << 4);

Thanks! I will incorporate these changes along with your Improvements-by tag.

BR,
Ricardo