[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171011082749.7z23viezxyds2utx@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:27:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, npiggin@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched/wait: Add swq_has_sleepers()
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 12:00:17PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Which is the equivalent of what we have in regular waitqueues.
> I'm not crazy about the name, but this also helps us get both
> apis closer -- which iirc comes originally from the -net folks.
I'm confused. I don't see anything like this in the original waitqueue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists