[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf81be7b-4d6c-acd4-4f80-b8cfbbee625f@asrmicro.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:33:03 +0800
From: qiaozhou <qiaozhou@...micro.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Wilbur <wilburwang@...micro.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
<linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org>, <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and
try_to_del_timer_sync
Hi Will,
On 2017年10月02日 22:14, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Qiao,
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:02:03PM +0800, qiaozhou wrote:
>> Will this bodging patch be merged? It can solve the livelock issue on arm64
>> platforms(at least improve a lot).
>
> Whilst it seemed to help in some cases, I'm not keen to merge it until
> we've identified a sensible way to parameterise the threshold and also
> explain why it doens't appear to help at all on some platforms. I guess
> I could respin a version that takes the threshold on the cmdline and
> also checks to see that the event stream is enabled, since that might
> help with further benchmarking.
>
> Would that be useful?
Got it. Please let me know if you want to verify it on my platform. Many
thanks.
Best Regards
Qiao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists