[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171011093010.17173-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:30:10 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: make a couple of local functions static
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
The functions cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047 and cht_int33fe_find_max17047
are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make
them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
symbol 'cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047' was not declared. Should it be
static?
symbol 'cht_int33fe_find_max17047' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
index 94716b2fbc00..286c6207765d 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct cht_int33fe_data {
* These helpers are used to work around this by checking if an i2c-client
* for the max17047 has already been registered.
*/
-int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
+static int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
struct i2c_client **max17047 = data;
struct acpi_device *adev;
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int cht_int33fe_check_for_max17047(struct device *dev, void *data)
return 1;
}
-struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void)
+static struct i2c_client *cht_int33fe_find_max17047(void)
{
struct i2c_client *max17047 = NULL;
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists