[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6c8f7f8-202c-37e5-7070-a8f141d2b93a@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:23:13 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, broonie@...nel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, mark.rutland@....com,
michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com, poeschel@...onage.de,
andreas.noever@...il.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de,
kheitke@...ience.com, bp@...e.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
james.hogan@...tec.com, pawel.moll@....com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il,
robh+dt@...nel.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org, alan@...ux.intel.com,
treding@...dia.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, jkosina@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, joe@...ches.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [Patch v6 1/7] slimbus: Device management on SLIMbus
On 11/10/17 11:21, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> ah which cases would those be. I was expecting that you would have a
>>> platform_device as a slimbus controller which would call slim_register?
>> As of now there is only one controller which uses platform driver, but in
>> future there might be more, but this is something which makes the slimbus
>> core more flexible.
> even if you have more controllers wouldn't we have similar number of platform
> devices. Each instance of the link/controller would have its device node.
>
Yep, I will give at try and see in next version!
thanks,
srini
> Thanks
> -- ~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists