lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 14:05:22 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>
CC:     <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7] Add support for USB OTG on STM32F7

Hi

On 10/11/2017 01:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com> writes:
>> Hi Felip
>>
>> On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com> writes:
>>>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB
>>>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its
>>>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy
>>>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy.
>>>>
>>>> Amelie Delaunay (7):
>>>>     dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding
>>>>     usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS
>>>>     ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU
>>>
>>> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems
>>> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers.
>>>
>>
>> I will take other DT patches in my PR.
>>
>> Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch
>> I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32
>> pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to
>> define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT
>> patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue.
>> It is possible that I take also this one ?
> 
> In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack:
> 
> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> I'll drop them from my tree now

Ok perfect, I will take DT patches (3 to 7) and I let you take patch 1&2 
in your tree.


Thanks
Alex

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ