[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASYmFf1NqVReq-mXhn8OsAkkxF0NXARDZ7L7oOC5zfpjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:03:28 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove unneeded copy to init_utsname()->machine
Hi arm64 maintainers,
Could you check this please?
2017-09-14 20:40 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>:
> As you see in init/version.c, init_uts_ns.name.machine is initially
> set to UTS_MACHINE. There is no point to copy the same string.
>
> I dug the git history to figure out why this line is here. My best
> guess is like this:
>
> - This line has been around here since the initial support of arm64
> by commit 9703d9d7f77c ("arm64: Kernel booting and initialisation").
> If ARCH (=arm64) and UTS_MACHINE (=aarch64) do not match,
> arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile is supposed to override UTS_MACHINE, but the
> initial version of arch/arm64/Makefile missed to do that. Instead,
> the boot code copied "aarch64" to init_utsname()->machine.
>
> - Commit 94ed1f2cb5d4 ("arm64: setup: report ELF_PLATFORM as the
> machine for utsname") replaced "aarch64" with ELF_PLATFORM to
> make "uname" to reflect the endianness.
>
> - ELF_PLATFORM does not help to provide the UTS machine name to rpm
> target, so commit cfa88c79462d ("arm64: Set UTS_MACHINE in the
> Makefile") fixed it. The commit simply replaced ELF_PLATFORM with
> UTS_MACHINE, but missed the fact the string copy itself is no longer
> needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 2 --
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> index f2b4e81..29764d7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_ftrace.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_insn.o = -pg
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = -pg
>
> -CFLAGS_setup.o = -DUTS_MACHINE='"$(UTS_MACHINE)"'
> -
> # Object file lists.
> arm64-obj-y := debug-monitors.o entry.o irq.o fpsimd.o \
> entry-fpsimd.o process.o ptrace.o setup.o signal.o \
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index d4b7405..b2fdb59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
> #include <linux/stddef.h>
> #include <linux/ioport.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> -#include <linux/utsname.h>
> #include <linux/initrd.h>
> #include <linux/console.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> @@ -246,7 +245,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> {
> pr_info("Boot CPU: AArch64 Processor [%08x]\n", read_cpuid_id());
>
> - sprintf(init_utsname()->machine, UTS_MACHINE);
> init_mm.start_code = (unsigned long) _text;
> init_mm.end_code = (unsigned long) _etext;
> init_mm.end_data = (unsigned long) _edata;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists