[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70607e4a-b2e1-7b0a-a9d1-0d7f52c3910a@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:23:53 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Gary Hook <gary.hook@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Part2 PATCH v5.1 12.1/31] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted
Virtualization (SEV) command support
On 10/11/2017 09:19 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 08:30:47AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> Basically we need some variable which is outside the per-device
>> structure so that we don't end up creating multiple /dev/sev nodes. If
>> needed, I think we can remove 'has_sev_fops' variable from struct
>> psp_device if we decide to dynamic alloc 'struct miscdevice sev_misc' in
>> struct psp_device. The 'has_sev_fops' is mainly used in sev_exit(). If
>> we decide to dynamic alloc sev_misc then in sev_exit() we can use
>> psp->sev_misc != NULL instead of psp->has_sev_ops.
>
> Yap, that sounds better than an explicit variable.
>
Sure, I will implement it and send you v5.2. thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists