[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171011160815.GA2655@localhost>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:08:15 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark expected switch fall-through in
check_urb_status
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:12:50AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Quoting Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>:
> > Patch is fine, but next time make sure to run scripts/get_maintainer.sh
> > to figure which people and lists to CC.
> >
>
> I actually did:
>
> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback
> drivers/staging/greybus/es2.c
>
> and this was the output:
>
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Very odd. If I run the exact same command I get the expected result:
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> (maintainer:GREYBUS SUBSYSTEM)
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org> (maintainer:GREYBUS SUBSYSTEM)
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> (maintainer:GREYBUS SUBSYSTEM)
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org (moderated list:GREYBUS SUBSYSTEM)
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org (open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM)
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
> > We also try to include the module (component) "es2" in the commit
> > summary (unless you really are doing things subsystem wide), although
> > that has not been enforced for staging clean ups recently.
> >
>
> I got it. I'll take that into account for future patches.
Looking at the commit history for the file in questions usually gives a
hint about the style used for the corresponding subsystem.
Thanks,
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists