linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] vfs.git regression fix Re: Regression related to ipc shmctl compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171011170335.GB21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:03:35 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robert O'Callahan <robert@...llahan.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git regression fix Re: Regression related to ipc
 shmctl compat

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 07:02:16PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Which tree do you prefer it to go through?  Direct to mainline, or vfs.git
> > #for-next?
> 
> for-next, it's not like it's in any way urgent.

Can I assume your normal S-o-b on that?  Just noticed that thing sitting
in misc queue with mismatched Author: and Signed-off-by:...