linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: introduce iommu invalidate API function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <541498d5-0478-0b9a-6c01-12f7dc30ebf3@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:38:30 +0800
From:   Bob Liu <liubo95@...wei.com>
To:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
CC:     "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] iommu: introduce iommu invalidate API function

On 2017/10/11 20:48, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On 11/10/17 13:15, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:54:52AM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:
>>> I didn't quite get 'iovm' mean. Can you explain a bit about the idea?
>>
>> It's short for IO Virtual Memory, basically a replacement term for 'svm'
>> that is not ambiguous (afaik) and not specific to Intel.
> 
> I wonder if SVM originated in OpenCL first, rather than intel? That's why
> I'm using it, but it is ambiguous. I'm not sure IOVM is precise enough
> though, since the name could as well be used without shared tables, for
> classical map/unmap and IOVAs. Kevin Tian suggested SVA "Shared Virtual
> Addressing" last time, which is a little more clear than SVM and isn't
> used elsewhere in the kernel either.
> 

The process "vaddr" can be the same as "IOVA" by using the classical map/unmap way.
This is also a kind of share virtual memory/address(except have to pin physical memory).
How to distinguish these two different implementation of "share virtual memory/address"?

--
Regards,
Liubo