[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD0092407@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:50:31 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@...el.com>,
"Mario.Limonciello@...l.com" <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/7] PCI: Distribute available buses to hotplug capable
PCIe downstream ports
From: Bjorn Helgaas
> Sent: 12 October 2017 00:33
> Why do you limit it to PCIe? Isn't it conceivable that one could
> hot-add a conventional PCI card that contained a bridge leading to
> another hotplug slot? E.g., a PCI card with PCMCIA slot or something
> on it?
There are (maybe were!) cardbus cards that contained PCI bridges to
connect to expansion chassis.
Bus enumeration was always a problem unless they were connected
at boot time.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists