[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171012111051epcms5p3117f59d0ec83cd2d62e36a0a2f73369f@epcms5p3>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:10:51 +0000
From: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@...sung.com>
To: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@...sung.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"chris@...is-wilson.co.uk" <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
PANKAJ MISHRA <pankaj.m@...sung.com>,
AMIT SAHRAWAT <a.sahrawat@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] stackdepot: ignore junk last entry in case of switch
from user mode.
Hi Dmitry,
>diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
>index f87d138..a045748 100644
>--- a/lib/stackdepot.c
>+++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
>@@ -214,6 +214,13 @@ depot_stack_handle_t depot_save_stack(struct stack_trace *trace,
> if (unlikely(trace->nr_entries == 0))
> goto fast_exit;
>
>+ /*
>+ * Ignore last entry if it belongs to user space
>+ * in case of switch from user mode.
>+ */
>+ if (!kernel_text_address(trace->entries[trace->nr_entries - 1]))
can we also add this check here:-
if (!kernel_text_address(trace->entries[trace->nr_entries - 1]) || in_interrupt())
Because on further checking , last frame in case of svc to interrupt mode is some random core kernel / Kernel Module address
like below:-
irq_exit+0xe4/0x140
__handle_domain_irq+0x9c/0x130
gic_handle_irq+0x40/0x80
__irq_svc+0x44/0x7c
hdmi_ocm_rx_get_scdc_sts+0x160/0x170 [sdp_hdmi] >> we need this frme??
This generates mismatch with existing entires and new entries get created and depot_index
value keep on increasing slowly and reaches max value (STACK_ALLOC_SLABS_CAP) but after this change
depot_index gets a stable value after some time. (Tested on ARM)
>+ trace->nr_entries--;
>+
> hash = hash_stack(trace->entries, trace->nr_entries);
> bucket = &stack_table[hash & STACK_HASH_MASK];
>
>--
>1.9.1
Regards,
Vaneet Narang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists