[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710121710580.1930@nanos>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:13:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] x86/cpuid: Add generic table for cpuid
dependencies
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
> > +/* Declare dependencies between CPUIDs */
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> > +
> > +struct cpuid_dep {
> > + unsigned short feature;
> > + unsigned short depends;
> > +};
>
> Why are these 16-bit fields? 16-bit data types should be avoided as much as
> possible, as they generate suboptimal code.
I was looking at that as well and decided that we preferrably have a
compressed data structure. The code which walks the table is hardly
performance critical and the difference in text size is marginal.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists