[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b524d6353d6e118ac537d41ff944bcf10aa38f5c.1507781178.git.garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:17:32 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/20] staging: lustre: ldlm: mark expected switch
fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index f3bf238..6943987 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_lock *lock,
case LDLM_IBITS:
if (ns->ns_cancel && ns->ns_cancel(lock) != 0)
break;
+ /* fall through */
default:
result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
lock_res_and_lock(lock);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists