lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171012025211.GC9177@sejong>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:52:11 +0900
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
        rajvi.jingar@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/33] tracing: Add support for 'field variables'

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:00:02PM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Users should be able to directly specify event fields in hist trigger
> 'actions' rather than being forced to explicitly create a variable for
> that purpose.
> 
> Add support allowing fields to be used directly in actions, which
> essentially does just that - creates 'invisible' variables for each
> bare field specified in an action.  If a bare field refers to a field
> on another (matching) event, it even creates a special histogram for
> the purpose (since variables can't be defined on an existing histogram
> after histogram creation).
> 
> Here's a simple example that demonstrates both.  Basically the
> onmatch() action creates a list of variables corresponding to the
> parameters of the synthetic event to be generated, and then uses those
> values to generate the event.  So for the wakeup_latency synthetic
> event 'call' below the first param, $wakeup_lat, is a variable defined
> explicitly on sched_switch, where 'next_pid' is just a normal field on
> sched_switch, and prio is a normal field on sched_waking.
> 
> Since the mechanism works on variables, those two normal fields just
> have 'invisible' variables created internally for them.  In the case of
> 'prio', which is on another event, we actually need to create an
> additional hist trigger and define the invisible event on that, since

s/event/variable/ ?


> once a hist trigger is defined, variables can't be added to it later.
> 
>   echo 'wakeup_latency u64 lat; pid_t pid; int prio' >>
>        /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/synthetic_events
> 
>   echo 'hist:keys=pid:ts0=$common_timestamp.usecs >>
>        /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_waking/trigger
> 
> echo 'hist:keys=next_pid:wakeup_lat=$common_timestamp.usecs-$ts0:
>       onmatch(sched.sched_waking).wakeup_latency($wakeup_lat,next_pid,prio)
>             >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/sched/sched_switch/trigger
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
> ---

[SNIP]

> +static bool compatible_keys(struct hist_trigger_data *target_hist_data,
> +			    struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> +			    unsigned int n_keys)
> +{
> +	struct hist_field *target_hist_field, *hist_field;
> +	unsigned int n, i, j;
> +
> +	if (hist_data->n_fields - hist_data->n_vals != n_keys)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	i = hist_data->n_vals;
> +	j = target_hist_data->n_vals;
> +
> +	for (n = 0; n < n_keys; n++) {
> +		hist_field = hist_data->fields[i + n];
> +		target_hist_field = hist_data->fields[j + n];

s/hist_data/target_hist_data/

> +
> +		if (strcmp(hist_field->type, target_hist_field->type) != 0)
> +			return false;
> +		if (hist_field->size != target_hist_field->size)
> +			return false;
> +		if (hist_field->is_signed != target_hist_field->is_signed)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}

[SNIP]

> +static struct hist_field *
> +create_field_var_hist(struct hist_trigger_data *target_hist_data,
> +		      char *system, char *event_name, char *field_name)
> +{
> +	struct trace_array *tr = target_hist_data->event_file->tr;
> +	struct hist_field *event_var = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data;
> +	unsigned int i, n, first = true;
> +	struct field_var_hist *var_hist;
> +	struct trace_event_file *file;
> +	struct hist_field *key_field;
> +	char *saved_filter;
> +	char *cmd;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (target_hist_data->n_field_var_hists >= SYNTH_FIELDS_MAX)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	file = event_file(tr, system, event_name);
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(file)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(file);
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	}
> +
> +	hist_data = find_compatible_hist(target_hist_data, file);
> +	if (!hist_data)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	var_hist = kzalloc(sizeof(*var_hist), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!var_hist)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	cmd = kzalloc(MAX_FILTER_STR_VAL, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cmd) {
> +		kfree(var_hist);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	}
> +
> +	strcat(cmd, "keys=");
> +
> +	for_each_hist_key_field(i, hist_data) {
> +		key_field = hist_data->fields[i];
> +		if (!first)
> +			strcat(cmd, ",");
> +		strcat(cmd, key_field->field->name);
> +		first = false;
> +	}
> +
> +	strcat(cmd, ":synthetic_");
> +	strcat(cmd, field_name);
> +	strcat(cmd, "=");
> +	strcat(cmd, field_name);
> +
> +	saved_filter = find_trigger_filter(hist_data, file);
> +	if (saved_filter) {
> +		strcat(cmd, " if ");
> +		strcat(cmd, saved_filter);
> +	}
> +
> +	var_hist->cmd = kstrdup(cmd, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!var_hist->cmd) {
> +		kfree(cmd);
> +		kfree(var_hist);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	}
> +
> +	var_hist->hist_data = hist_data;

Hmm.. so it's a compatible hist data, not the newly created one,
right?  Might confuse someone later.. ;-)


> +
> +	ret = event_hist_trigger_func(&trigger_hist_cmd, file,
> +				      "", "hist", cmd);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		kfree(cmd);
> +		kfree(var_hist->cmd);
> +		kfree(var_hist);
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	}

What if two different event want to create synthetic variables for a
same field?  I suspect one failed because the variable names are same
but it could continue since the variable is there anyway.  Probably it
would be better to use a different error code for the case..

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +
> +	strcpy(cmd, "synthetic_");
> +	strcat(cmd, field_name);
> +
> +	event_var = find_event_var(tr, system, event_name, cmd);
> +	if (!event_var) {
> +		kfree(cmd);
> +		kfree(var_hist->cmd);
> +		kfree(var_hist);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}
> +
> +	n = target_hist_data->n_field_var_hists;
> +	target_hist_data->field_var_hists[n] = var_hist;
> +	target_hist_data->n_field_var_hists++;
> +
> +	return event_var;
> +}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ