linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171012183505.oo77lgdbmqjevsuo@sirena.co.uk>
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2017 19:35:05 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Chaya Rachel Ivgi <chaya.rachel.ivgi@...el.com>,
        Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@...el.com>,
        Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with
 the wireless-drivers tree

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 09:27:46PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 19:21 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I may have confused the trees when I was pasting things in, the
> > commits
> > are filled in by hand.

> Ah, okay.  But still, if the same patches conflicted twice, why wasn't
> there only one occurrence with both conflicts at once?

With trees like this that don't coordinate with their fixes branch there
are frequently multiple conflicts introduced so I generally report
things file by file without even looking at the new ones.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)