[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2852603f-ce98-9f8e-8d86-1d601445a1ff@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:48:22 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/6] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue
On 10/12/17 11:37, Ming Lei wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> This patch improves dispatching from sw queue by using the callback of
> .get_budget and .put_budget
>
> Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> Jens/Omar, once .get_budget is introduced, it can be unusual to
> return busy from .queue_rq, so we can't use the approach discussed
> to decide to take one by one or flush all. Then this patch
> simply checks if .get_budget is implemented, looks it is reasonable,
> and in future it is even possible to take more requests by getting
> enough budget first.
> [ ... ]
Version 7 of this patch differs significantly from the version I
reviewed so I think you should remove my Reviewed-by tag.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists