[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG53R5WpiVT5R3EmjyMzi==1ZbvUOCeVjccHFTOE5p2VwkXzhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:24:20 -0500
From: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
To: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/cma: make config_item_type const
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com> wrote:
>> This is a followup patch for: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/375 and
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999649/
>>
>> Make these structures const as they are either passed to the functions
>> having the argument as const or stored as a reference in the "ci_type"
>> const field of a config_item structure.
>>
>> Done using Coccienlle.
>>
>
> This patch is dependent on the patches in the links
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/375 and
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999649/. Therefore, this patch
> won't be correct unless the patches in these links gets applied.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c
>> index 54076a3..31dfee0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cma_configfs.c
>> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static ssize_t default_roce_tos_store(struct config_item *item,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>> -static struct config_item_type cma_port_group_type = {
>> +static const struct config_item_type cma_port_group_type = {
>> .ct_attrs = cma_configfs_attributes,
>> .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE
>> };
>> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static void release_cma_ports_group(struct config_item *item)
>> .release = release_cma_ports_group
>> };
>>
>> -static struct config_item_type cma_ports_group_type = {
>> +static const struct config_item_type cma_ports_group_type = {
>> .ct_item_ops = &cma_ports_item_ops,
>> .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE
>> };
>> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static void release_cma_ports_group(struct config_item *item)
>> .release = release_cma_dev
>> };
>>
>> -static struct config_item_type cma_device_group_type = {
>> +static const struct config_item_type cma_device_group_type = {
>> .ct_item_ops = &cma_device_item_ops,
>> .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE
>> };
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static struct config_group *make_cma_dev(struct config_group *group,
>> .make_group = make_cma_dev,
>> };
>>
>> -static struct config_item_type cma_subsys_type = {
>> +static const struct config_item_type cma_subsys_type = {
>> .ct_group_ops = &cma_subsys_group_ops,
>> .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> };
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> --
Patch subject should be RDMA/cma even though in past we have mix of
IB/cma and RDMA/cma patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists