[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1507847249.21121.207.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:27:29 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Qemu Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@...el.com>,
Nitesh Narayan Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...el.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] KVM: add virtio-pmem driver
On Thu, 2017-10-12 at 18:18 -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest.
> > > > > Guest reads the persistent memory range information
> > > > > over virtio bus from Qemu and reserves the range
> > > > > as persistent memory. Guest also allocates a block
> > > > > device corresponding to the pmem range which later
> > > > > can be accessed with DAX compatible file systems.
> > > > > Idea is to use the virtio channel between guest and
> > > > > host to perform the block device flush for guest pmem
> > > > > DAX device.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is work to do including DAX file system support
> > > > > and other advanced features.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 10 ++
> > > > > drivers/virtio/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pmem.c | 322
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 55 +++++++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 388 insertions(+)
> > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > > > index cff773f15b7e..0192c4bda54b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ config VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY
> > > > >
> > > > > If unsure, say Y.
> > > > >
> > > > > +config VIRTIO_PMEM
> > > > > + tristate "Virtio pmem driver"
> > > > > + depends on VIRTIO
> > > > > + ---help---
> > > > > + This driver adds persistent memory range within a
> > > > > KVM guest.
With "Virtio Block Backed Pmem" we could name the config
option VIRTIO_BLOCK_PMEM
The documentation text could make it clear to people that the
image shows up as a disk image on the host, but as a pmem
memory range in the guest.
> > > > I think we need to call this something other than persistent
> > > > memory to
> > > > make it clear that this not memory where the persistence can be
> > > > managed from userspace. The persistence point always requires
> > > >
> > So currently /proc/iomem in a guest with a pmem device attached to
> > a
> > namespace looks like this:
> >
> > c00000000-13bfffffff : Persistent Memory
> > c00000000-13bfffffff : namespace2.0
> >
> > Can we call it "Virtio Shared Memory" to make it clear it is a
> > different beast than typical "Persistent Memory"? You can likely
>
> I think somewhere we need persistent keyword 'Virtio Persistent
> Memory' or
> so.
Still hoping for better ideas than "Virtio Block Backed Pmem" :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists