linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171013054109.GA21174@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:41:09 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 05:45:01PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 03:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.7 release.
> > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat Oct 14 21:25:27 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.13.7-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.13.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. 
> kselftest run regression since 4.13.6
> 
> selftests: posix_timers
> 
> selftests: raw_skew
> ========================================
> not ok 1..7 selftests:  raw_skew [FAIL]
> 
> No idea why yet. cc'ing John Stultz to see if he has any ideas.

That's odd, given the small number of patches here...

thanks for testing.

greg k-h