[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59E13A3F.5070509@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:12:15 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Remove redundant OF_DETACHED flag setting
On 10/13/17 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> of_fdt_unflatten_tree() already sets the flag on the node to
> OF_DETACHED, because of_fdt_unflatten_tree() calls
> __unflatten_device_tree() with the detached bool set to true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> index 35bf9617ae59..8795478a4754 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> @@ -1112,7 +1112,6 @@ static int __init unittest_data_add(void)
> pr_warn("%s: No tree to attach; not running tests\n", __func__);
> return -ENODATA;
> }
> - of_node_set_flag(unittest_data_node, OF_DETACHED);
> rc = of_resolve_phandles(unittest_data_node);
> if (rc) {
> pr_err("%s: Failed to resolve phandles (rc=%i)\n", __func__, rc);
> @@ -2262,7 +2261,6 @@ static int __init overlay_data_add(int onum)
> ret = 0;
> goto out_free_data;
> }
> - of_node_set_flag(info->np_overlay, OF_DETACHED);
>
> ret = of_resolve_phandles(info->np_overlay);
> if (ret) {
>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Should be no conflict with my patch series "[PATCH 00/12] of: overlay: clean up
device tree overlay code" [1], just a line offset.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/2/679
Powered by blists - more mailing lists