[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171013002036.GB24715@ming.t460p>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:20:37 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/6] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:48:22AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/12/17 11:37, Ming Lei wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > This patch improves dispatching from sw queue by using the callback of
> > .get_budget and .put_budget
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Jens/Omar, once .get_budget is introduced, it can be unusual to
> > return busy from .queue_rq, so we can't use the approach discussed
> > to decide to take one by one or flush all. Then this patch
> > simply checks if .get_budget is implemented, looks it is reasonable,
> > and in future it is even possible to take more requests by getting
> > enough budget first.
> > [ ... ]
>
> Version 7 of this patch differs significantly from the version I reviewed so
> I think you should remove my Reviewed-by tag.
OK, no problem, the only difference is on the introduced .get_budget().
--
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists