linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for ThunderX2 pmu events using json files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171013091141.GA11429@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:11:42 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gklkml16@...il.com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, jnair@...iumnetworks.com,
        Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        Robert Richter <Robert.Richter@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for ThunderX2 pmu events using json
 files

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:54:50PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:41:12PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> >> Extending json/jevent framework for parsing arm64 event files.
> >> Adding jevents for ThunderX2 implementation defined PMU events.
> >>
> >> v8:
> >>    - Rename thunderx2 directory to cavium
> >
> > For the series:
> >
> > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> 
> thanks.
> >
> > Although note that this conflicts against a queued fix from Mark[1], so
> > you'll need to rebase on top of that.
> 
> sure, will do.
> may i know the branch/repo which i can rebase to?

Arnaldo said he was going to apply it to his perf/urgent branch [1],
although I can't spot it there yet. I'm also not sure whether that's the
right thing on which to base 4.15 material. Arnaldo -- what's the best
thing to do here?

Cheers,

Will

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171009190000.GL2121@redhat.com