[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171013102231.GZ2761@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:22:32 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / QoS: Drop PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:35:12AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The PM QoS flag PM_QOS_FLAG_REMOTE_WAKEUP is not used consistently
> and the vast majority of code simply assumes that remote wakeup
> should be enabled for devices in runtime suspend if they can
> generate wakeup signals, so drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists