[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d98bfc90-e857-4bbe-bfbc-ee69dc310cc0@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:04:08 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, page_alloc: fail has_unmovable_pages when seeing
reserved pages
On 10/13/2017 02:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> Reserved pages should be completely ignored by the core mm because they
> have a special meaning for their owners. has_unmovable_pages doesn't
> check those so we rely on other tests (reference count, or PageLRU) to
> fail on such pages. Althought this happens to work it is safer to simply
> check for those explicitly and do not rely on the owner of the page
> to abuse those fields for special purposes.
>
> Please note that this is more of a further fortification of the code
> rahter than a fix of an existing issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index ad0294ab3e4f..a8800b0a5619 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7365,6 +7365,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
>
> page = pfn_to_page(check);
>
> + if (PageReferenced(page))
"Referenced" != "Reserved"
> + return true;
> +
> /*
> * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable.
> * We need not scan over tail pages bacause we don't
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists