[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbEeq3qeF41Mn1vE=DgdkrGJ1P91Yff4cAW98FhBJO-nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:48:43 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Mathias Duckeck <m.duckeck@...bus.de>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@...chenk.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] GPIO driver for Maxim MAX3191x
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> - Patch [1/5]: Change the argument order of assign_bit() to reflect
> traditional "dst = src" in C. (Peter Zijlstra)
>
> - Patch [2/5]: Update documentation. (Linus Walleij)
> Drop const qualifier from struct gpio_desc ** in all function
> signatures to avoid a cast when passing a non-const array created
> with gpiod_get_array(), which is likely the most common use case.
Applied these two so we get the infrastructure in place so others
can use it too.
> - Patch [3/5]: Newly inserted patch to introduce common property for
> number of daisy-chained devices.
>
> - Patch [4/5]: Add vendor prefix to GPIO identifiers, use boolean
> instead of integer to select mode, rename boolean to ignore
> undervoltage alarms, separate compatible strings with newlines.
> (Rob Herring)
>
> - Patch [5/5]: Optimize algorithm in max3191x_get_multiple() to
> iterate over the bits in the mask, instead of iterating over every
> chip, thus implicitly skipping chips which are not selected at all
> by the mask.
These are pending device tree maintainer review.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists