linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:05:40 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review

On 10/12/2017 06:09 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>> On 10/12/2017 03:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.7 release.
>>> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sat Oct 14 21:25:27 UTC 2017.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>       kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.13.7-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.13.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>
>> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
>> kselftest run regression since 4.13.6
>>
>> selftests: posix_timers
>>
>> selftests: raw_skew
>> ========================================
>> not ok 1..7 selftests:  raw_skew [FAIL]
> 
> Hrm... Did raw_skew provide any other output?
> 
> Also, did you turn ntpd off before running?
> 
> -john
> 

John/Greg,

Here is the detailed report fromn this test. I didn't disable ntpd.

WARNING: ADJ_OFFSET in progress, this will cause inaccurate results
Estimating clock drift: -16.319(est) -8.913(act)	[FAILED]
Bail out!
Pass 0 Fail 0 Xfail 0 Xpass 0 Skip 0 Error 0
1..0

I can keep on eye on this. Not a show stopper for releasing the rc.

thanks,
-- Shuah