lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171013165555.GF25400@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:55:56 -0500
From:   Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/6] ARM: dts: DRA72: Add CAL dtsi node

Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote on Fri [2017-Oct-13 09:54:09 -0700]:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> [171012 12:29]:
> > This patch adds the required dtsi node to support the Camera
> > Adaptation Layer (CAL) for the DRA72 family of devices.
> > 
> > - Added CAL entry in dra72x.dtsi.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72x.dtsi | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72x.dtsi
> > index 67107605fb4c..d0ba4f238084 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72x.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72x.dtsi
> > @@ -17,6 +17,37 @@
> >  		interrupt-parent = <&wakeupgen>;
> >  		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 131 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >  	};
> > +
> > +	ocp {
> > +		cal: cal@...5b000 {
> > +			compatible = "ti,dra72-cal";
> > +			ti,hwmods = "cal";
> > +			reg = <0x4845B000 0x400>,
> > +			      <0x4845B800 0x40>,
> > +			      <0x4845B900 0x40>,
> > +			      <0x4A002e94 0x4>;
> 
> Care to fix the cAmelcasing here? All lower case hex is pretty much the
> standard with linux, so might as well lower case them all while at it.

Sure thing, I'll fix it.

Benoit

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ