linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 5/6] ARM: DRA7: hwmod: Add VPE nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 12:01:23 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Cc:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 5/6] ARM: DRA7: hwmod: Add VPE nodes

* Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> [171013 11:06]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote on Fri [2017-Oct-13 10:05:13 -0700]:
> > * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> [171012 12:28]:
> > > +static struct omap_hwmod_class_sysconfig dra7xx_vpe_sysc = {
> > > +	.sysc_offs	= 0x0010,
> > > +	.sysc_flags	= (SYSC_HAS_MIDLEMODE | SYSC_HAS_SIDLEMODE),
> > > +	.idlemodes	= (SIDLE_FORCE | SIDLE_NO | SIDLE_SMART |
> > > +			   MSTANDBY_FORCE | MSTANDBY_NO |
> > > +			   MSTANDBY_SMART),
> > > +	.sysc_fields	= &omap_hwmod_sysc_type2,
> > > +};
> > 
> > I think checkpatch.pl --strict would complain about unnecessary
> > parentheses, might as well check the whole series while at it.
> 
> I actually ran the whole series through "checkpatch.pl --strict"
> before posting. And other then the usual MAINTAINER file needing
> update warning for the binding patch it no other warning or error.
> 
> Based on the rest of the file I believe the parentheses around those
> flags are at least consistent.

OK fine thanks for checking.

> Now, would the .rev_offs comment also apply here?

I don't think it has it, you might want to dump out the value
at offset 0 and see if it contains anything.

Regards,

Tony