[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171013204611.7487f55c@alans-desktop>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2017 20:46:11 +0100
From:   Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:     <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>
Cc:     <greg@...ah.com>, <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <luto@...nel.org>,
        <quasisec@...gle.com>, <pali.rohar@...il.com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        <mjg59@...gle.com>, <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/15] platform/x86: dell-smbios: add filtering
 capability for requests
> I think I'd actually like to meld this with your other ideas and what I've 
> currently got.  What do you think of this approach:
> 
> 	/* kernel community doesn't feel userspace should have access at all
> 	  * or other kernel drivers use this
> 	  */
> 	if (blacklisted)
> 		return NO;
> 
> 	/* unprivileged access allowed */
>  	if (whitelisted & (capabilities && whitelist->capability_need) ==
>  	whitelist->capability_need))
>  		return ALLOWED;
>  
> 	/* not yet in whitelist, or need privs to do */
>  	if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
>  		return ALLOWED;
>  
>  	return NO
> 
This looks sensible to me. Note that the middle case isn't necessarily
'unprviliged'. If the entyr is whitelisted and the capability_need is 0
then it means 'anyone' but you can also set any other appropriate
capability (eg CAP_NET_ADMIN for a WMI call that does stuff to the wifi).
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists