linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171014052321.GA21519@ming.t460p>
Date:   Sat, 14 Oct 2017 13:23:27 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Tom Nguyen <tom81094@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/7] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 02:23:07PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/13/2017 01:21 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 10/13/2017 01:08 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On 10/13/2017 12:05 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> Hi Jens,
> >>>
> >>> In Red Hat internal storage test wrt. blk-mq scheduler, we found that I/O
> >>> performance is much bad with mq-deadline, especially about sequential I/O
> >>> on some multi-queue SCSI devcies(lpfc, qla2xxx, SRP...)
> >>>
> >>> Turns out one big issue causes the performance regression: requests are
> >>> still dequeued from sw queue/scheduler queue even when ldd's queue is
> >>> busy, so I/O merge becomes quite difficult to make, then sequential IO
> >>> performance degrades a lot.
> >>>
> >>> This issue becomes one of mains reasons for reverting default SCSI_MQ
> >>> in V4.13.
> >>>
> >>> This 8 patches improve this situation, and brings back performance loss.
> >>>
> >>> With this change, SCSI-MQ sequential I/O performance is improved much, Paolo
> >>> reported that mq-deadline performance improved much[2] in his dbench test
> >>> wrt V2. Also performance improvement on lpfc/qla2xx was observed with V1.[1]
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150151989915776&w=2
> >>> [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150217980602843&w=2
> >>
> >> I wanted to run some sanity testing on this series before committing it,
> >> and unfortunately it doesn't even boot for me. Just hangs after loading
> >> the kernel. Maybe an error slipped in for v8/9?
> > 
> > Or it might be something with kyber, my laptop defaults to that. Test
> > box seems to boot (which is SCSI), and nvme loads fine by default,
> > but not with kyber.
> > 
> > I don't have time to look into this more today, but the above might
> > help you figure out what is going on.
> 
> Verified that the laptop boots just fine if I remove the kyber udev
> rule.

I can reproduce this issue with kyber switched to, and will figure out
it soon.

-- 
Ming